Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lazerjock

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 16
16
Media of the moment / Re: This might help
« on: February 10, 2010, 07:33:41 am »
That's great!

You should turn it into a laser show.

17
DACs / Re: Here comes another one!
« on: February 09, 2010, 07:45:18 am »
That looks great James.
How did you get the signal from the sound card to the amp?
My guess is you drilled a hole in both cases in the same spot to create a pass through for the wires.

Am I RIGHT? I love it when I'm right!

18
Lasers / Re: $400 RGV 30kpps Chinese projector
« on: February 08, 2010, 07:50:02 am »
Thanks James I ordered one.

19
Lasers / Re: Shinp DL-55 Double Tunnel Laser
« on: February 04, 2010, 07:44:47 am »
Gadget glad I could help a little. I'm sure there is a way to make this thing work. We love a challenge. We are masters of taking something that is meant for one thing and making it do something completely different.    Right James...

James I'll try to get set up on Skype. No promisses I'll use it very often though.

Chris

20
Hinged Newt / Re: More free Spaghetti shows
« on: February 04, 2010, 07:34:31 am »
Awsome!! Thank You.

21
Construction / Re: New member
« on: February 03, 2010, 03:13:49 pm »


Oh well. since a few other people want them too, I have ordered more parts than I need from a totally different source.

James.  :)

Does this mean I can buy a DC/DC converter from you?

22
Lasers / Re: Shinp DL-55 Double Tunnel Laser
« on: February 03, 2010, 03:09:51 pm »
This is GadgetZone. He just changed his name to protect the innocent.

He's the guy from Noozzy-Lund !!!  (is that better?)  ;D

We've spoken on Skype.

How come I don't have YOUR Skype name, Lazerjock? It's a fantastic waste of time!

James.  :)

I'm not set up on Skype. Besides I'm long asleep by the time you are just getting going. I see the time on some of your posts.

23
Lasers / Re: Shinp DL-55 Double Tunnel Laser
« on: February 03, 2010, 07:51:19 am »
Welcome to the group. Introduce yourself. We like to know the members.
Where are you located, how long have you had this cancer we call lasers.
What level of experience do you have, any electronics or programing experience?

There are many people here with a hugh amount of knowledge. We could bury you in information, so we need to know where to start.

With that said. Lets start with the easy fix.

Is the mirror you replaced a front surface mirror? Meaning is the reflective surface is on the "front" of the glass instead of the back.
You can easily tell by first finding something that won't scratch the mirror like a q-tip. Then touch it to the surface that you want the laser to reflect. If you are able to "touch" the reflection of the q-tip with no gap, then you have a front surface mirror. If you have a gap, then its standard rear surface mirrors. Rear surface mirrors will cause a ghost image or fuzzy image.
I suspect you used a rear surface mirror.

Aligining a laser projector is an art form sometimes it can be challenging sometimes very easy.
By calibrating I assume you mean align all of the scanned images to point in the same direction all in a line. (not all scanned images on top of each other).
Once we determine your experience level we can try to get this thing aligned better.

Lazerjock

24
Optics / Re: Maybe a good deal?
« on: February 02, 2010, 07:37:56 am »
I didn't see any specs at all.

25
Hinged Newt / Re: Spaghetti contest winners
« on: February 02, 2010, 07:31:04 am »
Maybe I'll try next time too.

26
Construction / Re: Dr Lava Flexmod Drives???
« on: February 01, 2010, 07:34:45 am »
You are going to have to put larger heat sinks on the FlexMod's at that current.

27
And Now For Something Completely Different! / Re: Rock Band is AWESOME
« on: February 01, 2010, 07:29:49 am »

Once again I would say The Beatles Rock Band is just plain stunning.

James.  :)

Ok I may have to get it now.

28
And Now For Something Completely Different! / Re: Now That's a Standard!
« on: February 01, 2010, 07:27:54 am »
You guys crack me up!

29
And Now For Something Completely Different! / Re: Now That's a Standard!
« on: January 29, 2010, 07:36:28 am »
would make more sense to create an atom based measurement where a few million carbon atoms were counted one by one then weighed ..

however weight is subject to change as the major masses on out planet, our solar system, and to a lesser extent, the universe, move.

earths mass changes daily.

If you consider that weight is based on gravitational pull, and that a Kg would "weigh" less on the moon, then its not hard to understand that when the earths mass changes, weight also changes.

more to follow....

Don't seem very accurate to me either. At least by todays standards.

30
Construction / Re: New member
« on: January 26, 2010, 07:43:35 am »
Ramp that puppy up to 30K.
Lets see what it can really do....

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 16
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal